Preparing for Facilitating
Since I have facilitated in online classes previously, I thought that there would not be any problems in doing the assignment. Another faculty and I decided that it would be a good idea to partner for the assignment, since it would save time. We could organize it so that one faculty could do one aspect of facilitation and the other could do a different aspect. We were able to plan well and thought we had covered all of the issues regarding facilitation. We had a script to avoid the gaps in conversation and the ums, and ers that I had had in the voice introduction in the class. I particularly thought this was such a clever idea.
My group partner and I also decided that we would illustrate our topic "pedagogy" by utilizing the Constructivist point of view. The Constructivist educational philosophy emphasizes active learning which also encompasses principles of adult learning. Toward that end, we had planned to use a video clip and slides (for audio-visual learners) and a game on the whiteboard which would reach kinesthetic learners. Since we had both studied for a nursing educators exam that involved lots of material on pedagogy, we thought we would not have trouble with the content. Since we practiced using the clip, slides and game, we anticipated no problems in the sychronous portion of our assignment.
We both had facilitated asychronous discussion, so we didn't anticipate any problems in this area either. We did want to make sure that our inital posts were timely and interactive. Trying to come up with questions that were probative and stimulated ongoing discussion was not so simple. We were used to being on courses daily, so not a problem. We decided to divide the two discssions between the two of us.
The Actual Experience
The session started out well. Our script provided us with a clearly flowing narrative. When it came time to present the video, it wouldn't work. This despite that fact that I had practiced access the clip over and over again. Unfortunately, this made me very nervous. I went on to the slide show which was intended as a review on pedagogy. My mistake was thinking that I should ask questions instead of narrating the points on the slide. This didn't work well, since few people seemed to know about other educational pedagogies or philosophes. They were not really part of the course. Few answered my questions. Now I was desperate, I had a script, but the technical difficulties precluded me from using all of it.
Fortuantely, the game of tic tac toe was well received. People were able to add their x's and o's. There still seemed to be technical problems with people answering. Some had headsets that dind't work, others had computer problems. My fellow facilitator and I couldn't tell if there really was no response or no response due to technical difficulties.
The asynchronous sessions worked better. Dividing the discussions was an efficient way of doing things in that it helped us respond quickly to the disussion participants. From our peer review evaluations, our fellow students seemed to agree with us.
Major Learning Experience
This learning activity was a major one for me. I learned that even if one has worked out technical problems, other unanticipated ones can occur. I would put a video in class resources for students to view before discussing it in a synchronous Wimba session. I also learned that even if there are two people tryng to keep track of who is next to respond, it is difficult. I kept losing track of who was next after the raised hand symbol appeared on the screen.
I thought that having used slides for many years that I would not have a problem with stimulating discussion. I should have explained the unfamiliar educational philosophies on the slide instead of asking questions related to unfamiliar material.
Conclusion
I really did enjoy doing the facilitation. Even though I was not successful in using the video clip, I did attempt to use it and had some success. I just was not successful when the crunch came. I was satisfied that I had tried something new and was not afraid to confront unknown technological competencies. It was a sobering and useful experience.